Ethereum: What block space savings would we get for coinjoins (and payjoins) if we had cross-input signature aggregation?

I am providing an article on saving block space and combining Ethereum’s cross-input signatures. If you want me to continue, let me know.

Title: Ethereum: Cross-Input Signature Aggregation and Block Space Saving for Coinjoins (a speculative future soft fork)

Introduction

The Ethereum network is known for its complex consensus algorithm, which includes a multi-layered proof-of-work (PoW) mining process. While this system offers security and scalability benefits, it also has limitations in terms of block space consumption. Cross-Input Signature Aggregation (CISA) is a potential solution that aims to reduce the computational requirements of Ethereum’s PoW-based consensus algorithm.

What is cross-input signature aggregation?

Cross-input signature aggregation is a technique that involves combining signatures from multiple input blocks to produce a single combined signature. This process is designed to reduce the computational complexity required for proof of work, resulting in reduced block space savings and energy consumption.

Benefits of CISA in Ethereum

CISA has several potential benefits for Ethereum, including:

  • Reduced Energy Consumption

    : By aggregating signatures from multiple input blocks, CISA reduces the number of computations required to confirm a transaction.

  • Better Scalability: Reduced computational complexity can lead to faster block times and higher network throughput.
  • Improved Security

    Ethereum: What block space savings would we get for coinjoins (and payjoins) if we had cross input signature aggregation?

    : CISA can help reduce the risk of vulnerabilities in smart contracts by reducing the attack surface.

Weight Units vs. VBytes

To calculate potential block space savings, we need to consider both weight units (WU) and vBytes. Weight units are a measure of the computational complexity required by Ethereum’s PoW-based consensus algorithm, while vbytes represent the number of bytes used in the aggregate signature.

Assuming an average weight per unit of 2^16 bytes (1 KB), CISA can potentially reduce block space savings by up to 50% on average. This is because CISA aggregates signatures from multiple input blocks, reducing the computational complexity required for verification.

Speculative Future Soft Fork

To further explore the potential benefits of CISA and its impact on the Ethereum blockchain economy, we can consider a speculative future soft fork scenario. In this scenario, CISA will be implemented as part of the next major update (EIP-1559).

With CISA in place, Ethereum’s PoW-based consensus algorithm could be replaced by a proof-of-stake (PoS) scheme or a hybrid approach that combines elements of both algorithms. This would allow for better scalability and security benefits while reducing power consumption.

Conclusion

Cross-input signature merging can reduce block space savings on Ethereum by up to 50% on average, as it is able to merge signatures from multiple input blocks. While this is only a speculative future soft fork scenario, it highlights the importance of exploring alternative consensus algorithms that can improve scalability and security.

Recommendations

To maximize the benefits of CISA, we should consider the following recommendations:

  • Implement CISA on Ethereum: Consider implementing CISA as part of the next major update (EIP-1559) to achieve significant block space savings.
  • Hybrid PoS Approach: Explore a hybrid approach that combines elements of both algorithms to reduce energy consumption and increase scalability.

By exploring alternative consensus algorithms like CISA, we can work towards creating an even more scalable, secure, and efficient Ethereum network in the future.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *